COA FORENSIC AUDITOR
Validates one Certificate of Analysis in ~30s. This demo simulates document screening (COA/HPLC) with replicable criteria — is not a chemical verdict.
No noise. No opinion. Verifiable technical criteria.
LIVE
OPERATIONAL DEMO // DOCUMENT SCREENING COA/HPLC // CONFIDENCE SCORE (0–100) // NO CHEMICAL VERDICTS //
How the system is used in practice
✅ With Subject 157
- Structured forensic checklist (COA/HPLC)
- Confidence score based on technical criteria
- Identification of documentary red flags
- Risk-driven decision, not opinion
❌ Before Subject 157
Validation depended on isolated PDFs, anonymous forums, and subjective interpretations of COAs.
Critical decisions were made without replicable criteria or documented risk analysis.
Public evidence • Documented cases
How to use this demo correctly
Quick instructions (30 seconds):
- Open the COA you received (PDF or image)
- Observe the HPLC chart and metadata.
- Answer the questions based solely on the document
- Read the result as a risk indicator, not as final proof
Golden rule:
If the document fails here, it's not worth moving forward for operational decisions.
1. Digital Validation
Is there a code/QR that can be checked directly on the laboratory's website (e.g. Janoshik)?
2. Baseline
Is the baseline flat and stable, without excessive noise or undulation?
3. Visual purity
Does the chromatogram show a clear, dominant main peak?
4. Retention Time (RT)
Does the retention time match the historical standard for this compound?
5. Technical Data
Does the COA specify the column, flow, mobile phase and wavelength?
6. Data Consistency
Are dates, batches and names correct and consistent on all pages?
7. Mathematical coherence
Does the % purity (Area) match the image on the graph?
8. Identification
Is there a technician's signature and the laboratory's address/contact details?
Why this matters
Most errors do not occur due to deliberate fraud.
This occurs due to the absence of replicable technical criteria.
A COA may appear legitimate and still conceal:
- incomplete data
- graphic manipulation
- methodological inconsistencies
- false positives of purity
Most common errors
- Relying solely on purity value (%)
- Ignore noise and baseline instability
- Assuming that logo = legitimate laboratory
- Do not validate dates, batches, and method
- Confusing lack of data with acceptable results
What this score does NOT mean
- It is not a certificate of authenticity.
- Does not replace direct validation with the laboratory
- Does not guarantee clinical or legal safety
- It is not an absolute chemical verdict.
It is a structured indicator of document risk.
RESERVED ACCESS
The public information ends here.
- COA/HPLC audit: complete checklist + red flags + scoring
- Operational calculators: U-100, vectors, reconstruction
- Protocols: sterile hygiene + operational sequence
- Matrices: compatibility and synergies
Disclaimer
Technical notice:
This demonstration does not constitute chemical analysis, medical advice, or laboratory validation.
The result reflects only the structural coherence of the document and public technical criteria.
Operational decisions must always be supported by independent validation and professional judgement.
EN 
PT 
FR 
ES 
DE 
IT 
PL